Minnesota Mass Surveillance: Live ALPR Updates
We track changes to Flock transparency portals, automated license plate reader (ALPR) rosters, and other databases. When cameras are added, locations withheld, or data is shared with new departments - we log and publish each change.
-
Isanti County Sheriff's Office dropped off the state's license plate reader roster
Removed from state LPR rosterIsanti County Sheriff's Office is no longer listed on the Minnesota BCA's roster of agencies that use license plate readers. Its entry had listed eight camera locations: - 267th Avenue Northeast at Lyons Street Northeast, Stacy - Minnesota Highway 65 at 248th Avenue Northeast, Isanti - Minnesota Highway 95 at Hornsby Street Northeast, North Branch - Minnesota Highway 95 at Jarvis Street Northwest, Princeton - Minnesota Highway 65 at 421st Avenue Northeast, Braham - Minnesota Highway 47 at 253rd Avenue Northwest, Saint Francis - Minnesota Highway 47 at 421st Avenue Northwest, Ogilvie - 261st Avenue Northwest at Jarvis Street Northwest, Zimmerman Its "other devices with plate-reading capability" field read N/A. In May, the Isanti-Chisago County Star reported that the sheriff's office was running a trial of eight Flock cameras along county roadways, at a cost of $24,000 a year if continued, and that the sheriff would not seek a formal contract from county commissioners unless results justified it. No Flock transparency portal has been found for the office. The roster does not say why the agency was removed. The separate Isanti Police Department remains listed. Sources: - Minnesota BCA, "Agencies that use License Plate Readers (LPR)": https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/bca/data-and-reports/agencies-use-lprs-lpr - Isanti-Chisago County Star, "Sheriff defends Flock camera trial program" (May 21, 2026): https://www.isanti-chisagocountystar.com/news/sheriff-defends-flock-camera-trial-program/article_f62580fb-4192-4eb8-ba83-e0cc5b1564ed.html
What does this mean?
The agency no longer appears on the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension's public list of agencies that operate automated license plate readers. This can mean the agency stopped using the technology, or simply that its reporting to the BCA lapsed or was revised. Removal from the roster does not confirm that cameras are gone or that collected data has been destroyed; under Minn. Stat. 13.824, plate reads not tied to an active investigation must be destroyed within 60 days, but an agency may still hold and share records beyond that for qualifying cases. -
Duluth PD dropped all of its license plate reader locations from its state roster entry
Camera locations removedDuluth PD's entry on the Minnesota BCA license plate reader roster now lists its camera locations as "N/A". Duluth PD is still on the roster. No longer listed: - Grand Avenue at North 55th Avenue West - South 27th Avenue West at West Michigan Street (2) - Minnesota Highway 39 (East McCuen Street) - East Central Entrance at Rice Lake Road - Minnesota Hwy. 194 at Rice Lake Road - West Michigan Street at North 46th Avenue West - Mesaba Avenue at West First Street - Lake Avenue at Superior Street - 46th Avenue West at Michigan Street The department announced in August that it would not renew its Flock contract, which expired Sept. 7, 2026. It said it would keep using some license plate reader applications but did not name them. Sources: - Minnesota BCA, "Agencies that use License Plate Readers (LPR)": https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/bca/data-and-reports/agencies-use-lprs-lpr - FOX 9, "Duluth PD ends Flock camera contract, will keep using license plate reader tech" (Aug. 11, 2026): https://fox9.com/news/duluth-pd-ends-flock-camera-contract-keep-using-license-plate-reader-tech
What does this mean?
One or more camera locations no longer appear on the agency's entry in the Minnesota BCA's public roster of license plate reader users. A dropped location can mean a camera was taken down or moved, or that the listing was only edited; the roster does not say which. Plate reads already collected can stay on file, since Minn. Stat. 13.824 requires destruction within 60 days only for reads not tied to an active investigation. The roster covers every ALPR vendor, not just Flock Safety. -
Fridley PD changed one license plate reader location on its state roster entry
OtherOne of Fridley PD's six listed license plate reader locations on the Minnesota BCA roster changed: - Was: 5600 block of East River Road NE - Now: 5800 block of East River Road NE The other five locations are unchanged. The roster does not say whether the camera was moved or the address was corrected. Source: Minnesota BCA, "Agencies that use License Plate Readers (LPR)": https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/bca/data-and-reports/agencies-use-lprs-lpr
What does this mean?
A change that does not fit the standard categories. See the update's details for specifics. -
Itasca County Sheriff's Office dropped off the state's license plate reader roster
Removed from state LPR rosterItasca County Sheriff's Office is no longer listed on the Minnesota BCA's roster of agencies that use license plate readers. Before it disappeared, its roster entry already listed no camera locations and no other devices with plate-reading capability (both "N/A"). Related earlier changes: - In September, the office's roster entry stopped naming any camera locations: /mn/itasca-county-sheriff/stopped-disclosing-fixed-alpr-locations - In late September, Paul Bunyan Task Force, Spring Lake Park PD and St. Paul PD stopped listing the office as a Flock sharing partner. The roster does not say why the agency was removed. Source: Minnesota BCA, "Agencies that use License Plate Readers (LPR)": https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/bca/data-and-reports/agencies-use-lprs-lpr
What does this mean?
The agency no longer appears on the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension's public list of agencies that operate automated license plate readers. This can mean the agency stopped using the technology, or simply that its reporting to the BCA lapsed or was revised. Removal from the roster does not confirm that cameras are gone or that collected data has been destroyed; under Minn. Stat. 13.824, plate reads not tied to an active investigation must be destroyed within 60 days, but an agency may still hold and share records beyond that for qualifying cases. -
St. Paul PD's Flock portal shows zero plate reads but 669 searches
Reduced TransparencySt. Paul PD's Flock transparency portal (transparency.flocksafety.com/st-paul-mn-pd) is still online. Its "last updated" date is November 1, 2026. The portal reports 0 unique vehicles detected over the last 30 days, so St. Paul's own cameras collected no plate reads in that period. It reports 669 search sessions by St. Paul users over the same 30 days. It still lists 1 camera location and 7-day data retention. With no plate reads of its own and a 7-day retention period, St. Paul PD would hold no current data from its own cameras. Its searches would therefore draw on data from other agencies in the Flock network. The portal still lists 53 organizations as having access to St. Paul PD data. They include the Ramsey County, Hennepin County and Anoka County sheriff's offices, the Paul Bunyan Task Force, and the University of Minnesota PD. Context: on August 26, 2026, the mayor and police chief announced that the city's two city-owned Flock cameras would be removed. The portal does not show whether the remaining listed camera is still installed or switched on. Its zero read count is consistent with a camera that is not collecting.
What does this mean?
The agency now discloses less about its license plate readers than it did before. That can mean camera locations withheld from the state BCA roster, metrics or policy details removed from its Flock transparency portal, or counts that go blank or stop updating. Some of this information is reported under Minn. Stat. 13.824 and some is voluntary, and withholding is not by itself a sign the cameras were removed or that the law was broken. It does make it harder for residents to see where the cameras are and how they are used. The underlying records can still be requested under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. -
White Bear Lake PD's ALPR audit reported zero findings as its camera program ended
Independent audit publishedIndependent audit by the Minnesota Security Consortium (MNSec), released as a closeout review, reported no findings across all statutory controls for White Bear Lake PD's automated license plate reader program. Program history: - Vendor: Motorola embedded ALPR, not Flock Safety -- no Flock transparency portal was ever published for this agency. - 7 mobile units on squad cars; no stationary cameras. - Operated October 26, 2024 to July 29, 2026, then shut down. - 60-day data retention, per the control panel setting reviewed in the audit. - The department asked the state BCA to remove its listing from the public LPR roster after the shutdown. As of this writing, the BCA roster still lists White Bear Lake PD. A zero-findings result is the norm in Minnesota, where roughly four in five audits clear the agency, and it often reflects a checklist review rather than substantive oversight. Source: Minnesota Legislative Reference Library, mandated report 261763.
What does this mean?
Minn. Stat. 13.824 subd. 6 requires every agency that operates ALPRs to obtain an independent audit at least every two years, checking that data is properly classified, used only for authorized purposes, destroyed on schedule, and that each query had a documented reason, with results due to state officials within 30 days. The audit is one of the few outside checks on how an agency actually runs its cameras. In practice most Minnesota audits report zero findings, often on a boilerplate template that clears nearly every agency it reviews, so a clean audit usually reflects a light-touch review rather than proof the program meets the intent of the statute. FinePrint's ALPR Audit Watch tracks each agency's audit date, auditor, and findings count. - Camera locations disclosed
Forest Lake PD's entry on the Minnesota BCA license plate reader roster now lists 13 camera locations, up from two. Already listed: - 11th Avenue SW at Eureka Avenue North - 2nd Street Northwest at Highway 8 (the earlier entry read "2nd Street NY at Highway 8") Newly listed: - Everton Avenue North at 220th Street North - Scandia Trail North at North Shore Trail North - Scandia Trail North at Hornsby Street Northeast - Scandia Trail North at Forest Road North - 12th Street Southwest at Broadway Avenue West - 3rd Street Northwest at Broadway Avenue West - Lyon Street Northeast at Broadway Avenue West - 6100 block of Scandia Trail North - 12th Street Southwest at 11th Avenue Southwest - 19th Street Southwest at Broadway Avenue West - Highway 61 at 184th Street North No Flock transparency portal has been found for Forest Lake PD, so its vendor is not confirmed. Source: Minnesota BCA, "Agencies that use License Plate Readers (LPR)": https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/bca/data-and-reports/agencies-use-lprs-lpr
What does this mean?
The agency's entry on the Minnesota BCA's public roster of license plate reader users now names camera locations it did not list before. Minn. Stat. 13.824 requires agencies to report where their permanently mounted readers are, and the BCA publishes those locations. A newly listed location can mean a new camera went up, or an existing camera was reported for the first time; the roster does not say which. The roster covers every ALPR vendor, not just Flock Safety, so a listing does not by itself show which company's cameras are at a location. -
Brooklyn Center PD dropped a license plate reader location from its state roster entry
Camera locations removedBrooklyn Center PD's entry on the Minnesota BCA license plate reader roster no longer lists this camera location: - 6455 Zane Avenue North The entry now lists ten locations along Brooklyn Boulevard, Shingle Creek Parkway, 51st Avenue North and 54th Avenue North. Source: Minnesota BCA, "Agencies that use License Plate Readers (LPR)": https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/bca/data-and-reports/agencies-use-lprs-lpr
What does this mean?
One or more camera locations no longer appear on the agency's entry in the Minnesota BCA's public roster of license plate reader users. A dropped location can mean a camera was taken down or moved, or that the listing was only edited; the roster does not say which. Plate reads already collected can stay on file, since Minn. Stat. 13.824 requires destruction within 60 days only for reads not tied to an active investigation. The roster covers every ALPR vendor, not just Flock Safety. -
Le Center PD added to Minnesota's state license plate reader roster
Added to state LPR rosterLe Center Police Department newly appears on the Minnesota BCA roster of agencies that use license plate readers (published under Minn. Stat. 13.824). Its entry lists no fixed or stationary device locations (N/A) and no other surveillance devices with LPR capability (N/A). The roster is vendor-neutral and covers every ALPR vendor; it does not identify Le Center PD's vendor, so this listing does not confirm the agency uses Flock. No Flock transparency portal has been verified for Le Center PD. Detected by a Distill monitor on the BCA page and confirmed against the live BCA page on 2026-10-23.
What does this mean?
The agency was added to the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension's public list of law enforcement agencies that operate automated license plate readers. Minn. Stat. 13.824 requires agencies using ALPR to report that use to the BCA, including the locations of any stationary cameras, and the BCA must publish the roster. A new listing is often the earliest public sign that an agency has started using the technology, sometimes appearing before any transparency portal exists. The roster covers every ALPR vendor, not just Flock Safety, so a listing alone does not establish which system an agency uses. -
Minnetonka PD dropped two license plate reader locations from its state roster entry
Camera locations removedTwo camera locations no longer appear on Minnetonka PD's entry on the Minnesota BCA license plate reader roster: - Wayzata Boulevard and Fairfield Road - Ridgedale Drive and Interstate 394 at Ridgedale Center (the roster text read "384") Five new locations were added in the same edit; see the separate update. Source: Minnesota BCA, "Agencies that use License Plate Readers (LPR)": https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/bca/data-and-reports/agencies-use-lprs-lpr
What does this mean?
One or more camera locations no longer appear on the agency's entry in the Minnesota BCA's public roster of license plate reader users. A dropped location can mean a camera was taken down or moved, or that the listing was only edited; the roster does not say which. Plate reads already collected can stay on file, since Minn. Stat. 13.824 requires destruction within 60 days only for reads not tied to an active investigation. The roster covers every ALPR vendor, not just Flock Safety. -
Minnetonka PD reported five new license plate reader locations to the state
Camera locations disclosedMinnetonka PD's entry on the Minnesota BCA license plate reader roster now lists 15 camera locations, up from 12. Five locations are new: - Minnetonka Boulevard and Plymouth Road - Minnetonka Boulevard and Larchwood Drive - Minnetonka Boulevard and Honeywood Lane - Oakland Road and Brightwood Drive - Hopkins Crossroad and Minnetonka Mills Road Two locations were dropped in the same edit; see the separate update. Source: Minnesota BCA, "Agencies that use License Plate Readers (LPR)": https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/bca/data-and-reports/agencies-use-lprs-lpr
What does this mean?
The agency's entry on the Minnesota BCA's public roster of license plate reader users now names camera locations it did not list before. Minn. Stat. 13.824 requires agencies to report where their permanently mounted readers are, and the BCA publishes those locations. A newly listed location can mean a new camera went up, or an existing camera was reported for the first time; the roster does not say which. The roster covers every ALPR vendor, not just Flock Safety, so a listing does not by itself show which company's cameras are at a location. -
Spring Lake Park PD stopped sharing with Medina PD
Stopped sharing with an agencyMedina MN PD was removed from the list of organizations granted access to Spring Lake Park PD data on its Flock transparency portal (between Distill snapshots of 2026-10-03 and 2026-10-22). Camera count (2), retention (7 days), and the rest of the sharing list were unchanged.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. - Camera locations disclosed
University of Minnesota PD's entry on the Minnesota BCA license plate reader roster previously said 14 locations were withheld under Minn. Stat. 13.824, subd. 8(b). It now publishes 13 camera locations: - Southeast 10th Avenue and Southeast 7th Street - Southeast 10th Avenue and Southeast 6th Street - Southeast 15th Avenue and Southeast Como Avenue - Southeast 15th Avenue and Southeast 8th Street - Southeast Huron Boulevard and Southeast Fulton Street - Southeast University Avenue and Southeast St. Marys Avenue - Southeast University Avenue and Southeast 12th Avenue - Southeast University Avenue and Southeast 15th Avenue - Southeast University Avenue and Southeast Ontario Street - East River Parkway and Southeast 27th Avenue - Riverside Avenue and 25th Avenue South - Southeast Washington Avenue and 19th Avenue South - Southeast 4th Street and Southeast 13th Avenue The source does not explain why 14 withheld locations became 13 published ones. Source: Minnesota BCA, "Agencies that use License Plate Readers (LPR)": https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/bca/data-and-reports/agencies-use-lprs-lpr
What does this mean?
The agency's entry on the Minnesota BCA's public roster of license plate reader users now names camera locations it did not list before. Minn. Stat. 13.824 requires agencies to report where their permanently mounted readers are, and the BCA publishes those locations. A newly listed location can mean a new camera went up, or an existing camera was reported for the first time; the roster does not say which. The roster covers every ALPR vendor, not just Flock Safety, so a listing does not by itself show which company's cameras are at a location. -
St. Paul PD stopped sharing with Winona PD
Stopped sharing with an agencyWinona PD (MN) no longer appears in the list of organizations granted access to Saint Paul Police Department data on its Flock transparency portal. Surfaced between portal snapshots of 2026-10-07 and 2026-10-08.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Paul Bunyan Task Force stopped sharing with Winona PD
Stopped sharing with an agencyWinona MN PD was removed from the list of organizations granted access to Paul Bunyan Task Force MN data. It was deleted from the list entirely rather than tagged [Inactive]. Everything else on the portal is unchanged from the previous snapshot (2026-10-04): 22 cameras, 30-day retention, the same hotlist sources (NCMEC Amber Alert, MN BCA), and the same policy text. Brooklyn Park MN PD and Columbia Heights MN PD remain flagged inactive. The change occurred sometime after 2026-10-04 and was detected on 2026-10-07. Winona PD's own portal was not checked, and Winona still appears on the St. Paul PD portal's sharing list as of the same window, so this looks like an ended sharing relationship rather than Winona leaving Flock. The portal does not say which side ended the sharing. Source: https://transparency.flocksafety.com/paul-bunyan-task-force-mn
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
St. Paul PD stopped sharing with Duluth PD
Stopped sharing with an agencyDuluth MN PD was removed from the list of organizations granted access to Saint Paul Police Department (MN) data. It was deleted from the list entirely rather than tagged [Inactive]. Everything else on the portal is unchanged from the previous snapshot (2026-10-04): 1 fixed LPR location, 7-day retention, the same hotlist sources (NCMEC Amber Alert, FBI National Hotlist, MN BCA), and the same policy text. The change occurred sometime after 2026-10-04 and was detected on 2026-10-07. Duluth PD's own portal was not checked, and Duluth does not appear on the Paul Bunyan Task Force sharing list in either snapshot, so no corroborating portal is known. The portal does not say which side ended the sharing. Source: https://transparency.flocksafety.com/st-paul-mn-pd
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
St. Paul PD stopped sharing with Maple Grove PD
Stopped sharing with an agencyMaple Grove MN PD was removed from the "Sharing Network Data With" list on the St. Paul PD transparency portal. It was present in the portal snapshot of 2026-09-25 and absent on 2026-10-04. Maple Grove's own Flock portal still loads and shows as active, so this appears to be a change to the sharing relationship, not Maple Grove leaving Flock. The portal does not say which side ended the sharing. The same removal appeared on the Spring Lake Park PD portal.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Chaska PD added to Minnesota's state license plate reader roster
Added to state LPR rosterChaska Police Department newly appears on the Minnesota BCA's published list of agencies that use license plate readers (Minn. Stat. 13.824), confirmed on the live page https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/bca/data-and-reports/agencies-use-lprs-lpr. The roster covers every ALPR vendor, not just Flock; Chaska's vendor is not confirmed as Flock, and no Flock transparency portal has been verified for the agency. The listing reports no fixed or stationary device locations and no other surveillance devices with LPR capability.
What does this mean?
The agency was added to the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension's public list of law enforcement agencies that operate automated license plate readers. Minn. Stat. 13.824 requires agencies using ALPR to report that use to the BCA, including the locations of any stationary cameras, and the BCA must publish the roster. A new listing is often the earliest public sign that an agency has started using the technology, sometimes appearing before any transparency portal exists. The roster covers every ALPR vendor, not just Flock Safety, so a listing alone does not establish which system an agency uses. -
Spring Lake Park PD stopped sharing with Maple Grove PD
Stopped sharing with an agencyMaple Grove MN PD was removed from the "Sharing Network Data With" list on the Spring Lake Park PD transparency portal. It was present in the portal snapshot of 2026-09-25 and absent on 2026-10-03. Maple Grove's own Flock portal still loads and shows as active, so this appears to be a change to the sharing relationship, not Maple Grove leaving Flock. The portal does not say which side ended the sharing. The same removal appeared on the St. Paul PD portal.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Shakopee PD disclosed a sixth license plate reader location on the state roster
Camera locations disclosedShakopee PD's entry on the Minnesota BCA license plate reader roster now lists a sixth camera location: - County Road 101 on the Lewis Street Bridge The five previously listed locations are unchanged: - Highway 169 south exit ramp to Marschall Road - 17th Ave. east of County Road 17 - County Road 83 south of Valley View Road - County Road 21 north of Old Carriage Court - Zumbro Avenue at Highview Terrace Source: Minnesota BCA, "Agencies that use License Plate Readers (LPR)": https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/bca/data-and-reports/agencies-use-lprs-lpr
What does this mean?
The agency's entry on the Minnesota BCA's public roster of license plate reader users now names camera locations it did not list before. Minn. Stat. 13.824 requires agencies to report where their permanently mounted readers are, and the BCA publishes those locations. A newly listed location can mean a new camera went up, or an existing camera was reported for the first time; the roster does not say which. The roster covers every ALPR vendor, not just Flock Safety, so a listing does not by itself show which company's cameras are at a location. -
University of Minnesota PD now reports 14 withheld license plate reader locations, up from 10
OtherOn the Minnesota BCA's public list of agencies that report using automated license plate readers (Minn. Stat. 13.824), the entry for University of Minnesota Police - Twin Cities changed between Sept. 25 and Sept. 29, 2026. The fixed or stationary device field previously read "Locations (10) withheld by the police department under Minnesota Statute 13.824, Subdivision 8 (b)" and now reads "Locations (14) withheld…". The locations themselves are not published, so the state roster does not say where the additional four devices are. The BCA roster is vendor-neutral, covering every ALPR vendor, so the count is not confirmed to be Flock cameras and may not match the Flock portal's camera count. Source: Minnesota BCA, "Agencies that use License Plate Readers (LPR)." Confirmed on the live page Sept. 29, 2026.
What does this mean?
A change that does not fit the standard categories. See the update's details for specifics. - Other
The agency's MN BCA license-plate-reader roster entry previously listed 19 specific fixed/stationary device locations around Grand Rapids and the rest of Itasca County (e.g. Scenic Highway at County Road 8 northbound in Bovey, Great River Road at County Line northbound in Grand Rapids, State Highway 65 at U.S. Highway 2 in Swan River, Route 169 in Taconite, and 15 others). As of this update the roster shows "N/A" for that field — the agency is still listed on the roster, but no longer discloses any fixed-location detail. The BCA roster covers every ALPR vendor, not just Flock; Itasca County Sheriff's Office's ALPR vendor is unconfirmed, so this should not be read as evidence of Flock use specifically. Itasca has also recently disappeared from the outbound sharing lists published by two Flock-portal agencies (Paul Bunyan Task Force, Spring Lake Park PD), which may reflect the same underlying change.
What does this mean?
A change that does not fit the standard categories. See the update's details for specifics. -
Spring Lake Park PD stopped sharing with Itasca County Sheriff's Office
Stopped sharing with an agencyItasca County MN SO was removed from the list of organizations granted access to Spring Lake Park MN PD data, taking the sharing list from 53 organizations to 52. It was deleted from the list entirely rather than tagged [Inactive]. Everything else on the portal is unchanged from the previous snapshot (2026-09-16): 2 cameras, 7-day retention, the same hotlist sources (NCMEC Amber Alert, MN BCA), and the same policy text. Brooklyn Park MN PD and Columbia Heights MN PD remain flagged inactive. Paul Bunyan Task Force also dropped Itasca County SO from its sharing list in the same window (logged 2026-09-24), which points to a change on Itasca County's side rather than two separate decisions. Itasca County's own transparency portal is not monitored, so it is not confirmed whether it left the Flock network or only ended these sharing agreements. Source: https://transparency.flocksafety.com/spring-lake-park-mn-pd
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
St. Louis Park PD's disclosed license plate reader locations grew from 8 to 13 on the state roster
OtherThe agency's MN BCA license-plate-reader roster entry for fixed/stationary device locations was substantially rewritten. Previous list (8 named intersections, one with 2 devices): Louisiana Avenue at Wayzata Boulevard; 16th Street West at Park Place Boulevard; Park Place Boulevard at Interstate 394 (2 devices); 16th Street West at Gamble Drive; Parkdale Drive at Park Place Boulevard; Excelsior Boulevard at France Avenue South; State Highway 7 at Lynn Avenue South; 8332 State Highway 7. Current list (13 named intersections, three with 2 devices): Park Place Boulevard and 16th Street West; Park Place Boulevard and Gamble Drive (2 devices); 16th Street West and Gamble Drive; 3015 Raleigh Avenue South; 8124 State Highway 7 (2 devices); State Highway 7 and Aquila Avenue South; 8458 State Highway 7; 37th Street West and Aquila Avenue South; 36th Street and Boone Avenue South (2 devices); Louisiana Avenue South and 14th Street West; Wayzata Boulevard and Kentucky Avenue South; Park Place Boulevard and Wayzata Boulevard; Park Place Boulevard and Cedar Lake Road. Some entries appear to be the same intersections restated in different word order; others (3015 Raleigh Avenue South, 8124/8458 State Highway 7, 37th Street West and Aquila Avenue South, 36th Street and Boone Avenue South, Wayzata Boulevard and Kentucky Avenue South, Park Place Boulevard and Cedar Lake Road) are newly disclosed, while several previous locations (Excelsior Boulevard at France Avenue South, State Highway 7 at Lynn Avenue South, 8332 State Highway 7, Parkdale Drive at Park Place Boulevard) no longer appear. St. Louis Park PD's separately-tracked Flock transparency portal is unaffected by this roster-only change and remains Active.
What does this mean?
A change that does not fit the standard categories. See the update's details for specifics. -
St. Paul PD stopped sharing with Itasca County Sheriff's Office
Stopped sharing with an agencyItasca County MN SO was removed from the list of organizations granted access to Saint Paul Police Department (MN) data, taking the sharing list from 57 organizations to 56. It was deleted from the list entirely rather than tagged [Inactive]. Everything else on the portal is unchanged from the previous snapshot (2026-09-23): 1 fixed LPR location, 7-day retention, the same hotlist sources (NCMEC Amber Alert, FBI National Hotlist, MN BCA), and the same policy text. This is the third monitored portal to drop Itasca County SO in the same window — Paul Bunyan Task Force (logged 2026-09-24) and Spring Lake Park PD (logged 2026-09-25) both removed it as well — which points to a change on Itasca County's side rather than three separate decisions. Itasca County's own transparency portal is not monitored (it has no known Flock portal), so it is not confirmed whether it left the Flock network entirely or only ended these sharing agreements; the MN BCA roster separately shows Itasca County SO's disclosed fixed ALPR locations changed to "N/A" around the same time, which may reflect the same underlying change but comes from a vendor-neutral source and is logged separately. Source: https://transparency.flocksafety.com/st-paul-mn-pd
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Paul Bunyan Task Force stopped sharing with Itasca County Sheriff's Office
Stopped sharing with an agencyItasca County MN SO was removed from the list of organizations granted access to Paul Bunyan Task Force MN data, taking the task force's sharing network from 63 organizations to 62. It was deleted from the list entirely rather than tagged [Inactive]. Everything else on the portal is unchanged from the previous snapshot (2026-09-23): 22 cameras, 30-day retention, the same hotlist sources (NCMEC Amber Alert, MN BCA), and the same policy text. Brooklyn Park MN PD and Columbia Heights MN PD remain flagged inactive. Itasca County's own transparency portal is not monitored, so it is not confirmed whether it left the Flock network or only ended this sharing agreement; no other monitored portal reported an Itasca County change in the same window. Source: https://transparency.flocksafety.com/paul-bunyan-task-force-mn
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Blaine PD dropped a license plate reader location from its state roster entry
Camera locations removedBlaine PD's entry on the Minnesota BCA license plate reader roster no longer lists this camera location: - Flanders Street NE north of 101st Avenue NE All other listed Blaine locations are unchanged. The roster does not say whether the camera was removed or moved. Source: Minnesota BCA, "Agencies that use License Plate Readers (LPR)": https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/bca/data-and-reports/agencies-use-lprs-lpr
What does this mean?
One or more camera locations no longer appear on the agency's entry in the Minnesota BCA's public roster of license plate reader users. A dropped location can mean a camera was taken down or moved, or that the listing was only edited; the roster does not say which. Plate reads already collected can stay on file, since Minn. Stat. 13.824 requires destruction within 60 days only for reads not tied to an active investigation. The roster covers every ALPR vendor, not just Flock Safety. -
Paul Bunyan Task Force stopped sharing with Todd County Sheriff's Office
Stopped sharing with an agencyTodd County MN SO was removed from the list of organizations granted access to Paul Bunyan Task Force MN data, taking the task force's sharing network from 64 organizations to 63. It was deleted from the list entirely rather than tagged [Inactive]. Everything else on the portal is unchanged from the previous snapshot (2026-09-04): 22 cameras, 30-day retention, the same hotlist sources (NCMEC Amber Alert, MN BCA), and the same policy text. Brooklyn Park MN PD and Columbia Heights MN PD remain flagged inactive. The change occurred sometime after 2026-09-04 and was detected on 2026-09-23. St. Paul PD also dropped Todd County from its sharing list in the same window (logged 2026-09-22), which points to a change on Todd County's side rather than separate decisions by each portal owner. Todd County's own portal is not monitored, so it is not confirmed whether Todd County left the Flock network or only these sharing agreements ended. Source: https://transparency.flocksafety.com/paul-bunyan-task-force-mn
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. - Camera locations disclosed
Ramsey County Sheriff's Office's entry on the Minnesota BCA license plate reader roster now lists two new camera locations in St. Paul: - University Avenue West and Cromwell Avenue - Larpenteur Avenue East and Mississippi Street In the same edit, three North Oaks lines ("Maycomb Road entry (1)", "Maycomb Road (2)" and "Maycomb Road entry (3)") were replaced by a single line, "Maycomb Road in North Oaks." The roster does not say whether that means fewer cameras on Maycomb Road or only a combined listing. Source: Minnesota BCA, "Agencies that use License Plate Readers (LPR)": https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/bca/data-and-reports/agencies-use-lprs-lpr
What does this mean?
The agency's entry on the Minnesota BCA's public roster of license plate reader users now names camera locations it did not list before. Minn. Stat. 13.824 requires agencies to report where their permanently mounted readers are, and the BCA publishes those locations. A newly listed location can mean a new camera went up, or an existing camera was reported for the first time; the roster does not say which. The roster covers every ALPR vendor, not just Flock Safety, so a listing does not by itself show which company's cameras are at a location. -
St. Louis County Sheriff's Office cut its disclosed license plate reader locations from ten to four
Camera locations removedSt. Louis County Sheriff's Office's entry on the Minnesota BCA license plate reader roster now lists four camera locations, down from ten. No longer listed: - Midway Road northbound at Seville Road - Lavaque Road southbound at Martin Road - Rice Lake Road northbound at Martin Road - County Road 21 southbound at Wahlsten Road - U.S. Highway 53 southbound at Minnesota Trunk Highway 194 - "U.S. Highway 5 southbound at Hobson Lake Road" (as written by the BCA) Still listed: - County Road 7 northbound at County Road 101 - County Road 4 northbound at County Road 16 - County Road 7 southbound at County Road 133 - County Road 77 northbound at Lost Lake Road The roster does not say whether the six cameras were taken down or moved, or whether the listing was only edited. Source: Minnesota BCA, "Agencies that use License Plate Readers (LPR)": https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/bca/data-and-reports/agencies-use-lprs-lpr
What does this mean?
One or more camera locations no longer appear on the agency's entry in the Minnesota BCA's public roster of license plate reader users. A dropped location can mean a camera was taken down or moved, or that the listing was only edited; the roster does not say which. Plate reads already collected can stay on file, since Minn. Stat. 13.824 requires destruction within 60 days only for reads not tied to an active investigation. The roster covers every ALPR vendor, not just Flock Safety. -
Maplewood PD added two license plate reader locations to its state roster entry
Camera locations disclosedMaplewood PD's entry on the Minnesota BCA license plate reader roster now lists 19 camera locations, up from 17. Newly listed: - White Bear Avenue North at County Road D East (southbound) - Larpenteur Avenue East at Century Avenue (westbound) The other 17 locations are unchanged. In a September 2026 statement, the city identified its equipment as Flock Safety cameras and said they were installed but not yet active. This roster edit does not show whether that has changed. No Maplewood Flock transparency portal has been found. Source: Minnesota BCA, "Agencies that use License Plate Readers (LPR)": https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/bca/data-and-reports/agencies-use-lprs-lpr
What does this mean?
The agency's entry on the Minnesota BCA's public roster of license plate reader users now names camera locations it did not list before. Minn. Stat. 13.824 requires agencies to report where their permanently mounted readers are, and the BCA publishes those locations. A newly listed location can mean a new camera went up, or an existing camera was reported for the first time; the roster does not say which. The roster covers every ALPR vendor, not just Flock Safety, so a listing does not by itself show which company's cameras are at a location. -
St. Paul PD stopped sharing with Todd County Sheriff's Office
Stopped sharing with an agencyTodd County MN SO was removed from the list of organizations granted access to Saint Paul Police Department (MN) data on the St. Paul PD Flock transparency portal, taking the sharing list from 58 organizations to 57. It was deleted from the list entirely rather than tagged [Inactive]. Everything else on the portal is unchanged from the previous snapshot (2026-09-05): 1 fixed LPR location, 7-day retention, the same hotlist sources (NCMEC Amber Alert, FBI National Hotlist, MN BCA), and the same policy text. The change occurred sometime after 2026-09-05 and was observed on the live portal on 2026-09-22. (The 2026-09-22 monitor alert itself captured a blank page load; the portal was live and fully rendered when checked directly the same day, so this entry reflects a direct comparison of the 2026-09-05 snapshot against the live portal.) Source: https://transparency.flocksafety.com/st-paul-mn-pd
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Wadena PD added to the state's license plate reader roster
Added to state LPR rosterThe Wadena Police Department appeared on the Minnesota BCA's list of agencies that use license plate readers, published under Minn. Stat. 13.824. It was not on the list as of Sept. 17, 2026 and was present as of Sept. 21, 2026 (confirmed against the live BCA page on Sept. 22). Its entry lists no fixed or stationary device locations ("N/A") and no other LPR-capable surveillance devices ("N/A"). The BCA roster covers every ALPR vendor, not just Flock Safety. This listing does not establish which vendor Wadena uses; no Flock transparency portal for Wadena PD was found as of this entry.
What does this mean?
The agency was added to the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension's public list of law enforcement agencies that operate automated license plate readers. Minn. Stat. 13.824 requires agencies using ALPR to report that use to the BCA, including the locations of any stationary cameras, and the BCA must publish the roster. A new listing is often the earliest public sign that an agency has started using the technology, sometimes appearing before any transparency portal exists. The roster covers every ALPR vendor, not just Flock Safety, so a listing alone does not establish which system an agency uses. -
Wayzata PD revised its disclosed camera locations on the state LPR roster
Camera locations disclosedWayzata PD's entry on the Minnesota BCA license plate reader roster now lists 11 camera locations, up from 10. One site is new: - Wayzata Boulevard at North Brown Road, eastbound (in Long Lake) The rest of the list was reordered, and several direction labels were changed or dropped. Previous list (10): - Central Avenue North at Highway 12, southbound - Wayzata Boulevard at Gleason Lake Road, westbound - Lake Street East at Edgewood Court, eastbound - Shoreline Drive at Peavey Road, eastbound - Wayzata Boulevard West at Myrtlewood Road, eastbound - Wayzata Boulevard West at Gleason Lake Road, eastbound - Bushaway Road at McGinty Road West, northbound - Grove Lane at Lake Street East, southbound - Lake Street East at Broadway Avenue, westbound - Wayzata Boulevard at Old Long Lake Road, westbound Current list (11): - Central Avenue North at State Highway 12, eastbound - Lake Street East at Edgewood Court, eastbound - Lake Street at Grove Lane, eastbound - Shoreline Drive at Peavey Road, eastbound - Lake Street East at Broadway Avenue - Bushaway Road at McGinty Road West - Wayzata Boulevard at Gleason Lake Road, westbound - Wayzata Boulevard at Gleason Lake Road, eastbound - Wayzata Boulevard at Old Long Lake Road - Wayzata Boulevard at Myrtlewood Road, eastbound - Wayzata Boulevard at North Brown Road, eastbound (in Long Lake) Wayzata PD's Flock transparency portal separately reports 11 LPR and other cameras. Source: Minnesota BCA, "Agencies that use License Plate Readers (LPR)": https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/bca/data-and-reports/agencies-use-lprs-lpr
What does this mean?
The agency's entry on the Minnesota BCA's public roster of license plate reader users now names camera locations it did not list before. Minn. Stat. 13.824 requires agencies to report where their permanently mounted readers are, and the BCA publishes those locations. A newly listed location can mean a new camera went up, or an existing camera was reported for the first time; the roster does not say which. The roster covers every ALPR vendor, not just Flock Safety, so a listing does not by itself show which company's cameras are at a location. -
Medina PD dropped four license plate reader locations from its state roster entry
Camera locations removedFour camera locations no longer appear on Medina PD's entry on the Minnesota BCA license plate reader roster: - Northridge Drive and County Road 24 - Northridge Drive and Hunter Drive - Deer Hill Road and Homestead Trail - 2800 block of Deer Hill Road The list went from six locations to four. Unchanged: - County Road 101 and Highway 55 - County Road 19 and County Road 11 Two new locations were added in the same edit; see the separate update. Medina PD's Flock transparency portal is tracked separately. Source: Minnesota BCA, "Agencies that use License Plate Readers (LPR)": https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/bca/data-and-reports/agencies-use-lprs-lpr
What does this mean?
One or more camera locations no longer appear on the agency's entry in the Minnesota BCA's public roster of license plate reader users. A dropped location can mean a camera was taken down or moved, or that the listing was only edited; the roster does not say which. Plate reads already collected can stay on file, since Minn. Stat. 13.824 requires destruction within 60 days only for reads not tied to an active investigation. The roster covers every ALPR vendor, not just Flock Safety. -
Medina PD reported two new license plate reader locations to the state
Camera locations disclosedMedina PD's entry on the Minnesota BCA license plate reader roster now lists two camera locations it did not list before: - State Highway 55 and County Road 19 - State Highway 55 and Clydesdale Trail Four locations were dropped in the same edit; see the separate update. Source: Minnesota BCA, "Agencies that use License Plate Readers (LPR)": https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/bca/data-and-reports/agencies-use-lprs-lpr
What does this mean?
The agency's entry on the Minnesota BCA's public roster of license plate reader users now names camera locations it did not list before. Minn. Stat. 13.824 requires agencies to report where their permanently mounted readers are, and the BCA publishes those locations. A newly listed location can mean a new camera went up, or an existing camera was reported for the first time; the roster does not say which. The roster covers every ALPR vendor, not just Flock Safety, so a listing does not by itself show which company's cameras are at a location. -
Spring Lake Park PD cut data retention from 30 days to 7 days
Data-retention period changedThe portal's Data Retention field changed from 30 days to 7 days. Everything else on the portal was unchanged from the previous snapshot (2026-09-04): 2 cameras, the same hotlist sources (NCMEC Amber Alert, MN BCA), the same 53-organization sharing list (Brooklyn Park MN PD and Columbia Heights MN PD still tagged [Inactive]), and the same acceptable use, prohibited use, access and hotlist policy text. The change was detected 2026-09-16 and took effect sometime after 2026-09-04. Spring Lake Park now matches the 7-day retention period shown on the Saint Paul PD portal.
What does this mean?
The number of days the agency keeps plate reads changed. Minn. Stat. 13.824 requires ALPR data not linked to an active criminal investigation to be destroyed within 60 days, so a general retention period above 60 days conflicts with state law. A longer window leaves a deeper searchable history of drivers' movements, and a shorter one limits how far back a query can reach. -
Edina PD stopped disclosing its 34 license plate reader locations on the state roster
Reduced TransparencyEdina PD's entry on the Minnesota BCA roster of agencies that use license plate readers (Minn. Stat. 13.824) used to list 34 fixed or stationary device locations. It now reads: "Location withheld by the police department under Minnesota Statute 13.824, Subdivision 8 (b)." The full list still appeared on Aug. 17, 2026. By Sept. 12, 2026 it had been replaced with the withholding statement, so the change happened between those two dates. FinePrint captured the list before it came down. The 34 previously disclosed locations were: • Eastbound West 44th Street at Curve Avenue • Southbound Xerxes Avenue at West 64th Street • Northbound Wooddale Avenue at West 50th Street • Southbound France Avenue at West 40th Street • Southbound Blake Road at Spruce Road • Westbound West 70th Street at Metro Boulevard • Northbound Tracy Avenue at Highway 62 • Eastbound West 70th Street at Normandale Road • Eastbound West 44th Street at Brookside Avenue • Eastbound West 77th Street at Computer Avenue • Eastbound West 60th Street at Xerxes Avenue South • Westbound Sunnyside Road west of France Avenue South • Westbound West 50th Street at Halifax Avenue • Northbound Wooddale Avenue at West 54th Street • Southdale Mall, West 66th Street (West entrance) • Southdale Mall, West 66th Street (East entrance) • Southdale Mall, York Avenue Park and Ride (northbound entrance) • Southdale Mall, York Avenue (southbound entrance) • Southdale Mall, West 69th Street (East entrance) • Southdale Mall, France Avenue (South Perimeter Road entrance) • Southdale Mall, France Avenue (North Perimeter Road entrance) • Galleria Mall entrance on West 69th Street, Entrance #1 • Galleria Mall entrance on West 69th Street, Entrance #2 • Galleria Mall, West 69th Street, Entrance #3 • Galleria Mall, West 69th Street, Entrance #4 • Galleria Mall, York Avenue, East Entrance #1 • Galleria Mall, York Avenue, East Entrance #2 • Galleria Mall, West 70th Street, East Entrance #1 • Galleria Mall, West 70th Street, Central Entrance #2 • Galleria Mall, West 70th Street, Central Entrance #3 • Northbound Bywood Street West at Interlachen Boulevard • Northbound Rolling Greens Parkway at Interlachen Boulevard • Northbound Merilane Avenue at Interlachen Boulevard • Grime Avenue South at Inglewood Avenue The new entry gives no count of withheld locations. The roster does not say whether any of these devices were removed. The other-device field still reads N/A, and Edina remains on the roster. Withheld status confirmed on the live BCA page on 2026-11-01. Edina PD uses Flock Safety and publishes a Flock transparency portal: https://transparency.flocksafety.com/edina-mn-pd. FlockFeed was not monitoring that portal when the locations were withdrawn; monitoring began Nov. 1, 2026. The BCA roster itself is vendor-neutral, so it does not say whether all 34 listed devices were Flock cameras. Source: MN DPS/BCA, Agencies that use License Plate Readers (LPR): https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/bca/data-and-reports/agencies-use-lprs-lpr
What does this mean?
The agency now discloses less about its license plate readers than it did before. That can mean camera locations withheld from the state BCA roster, metrics or policy details removed from its Flock transparency portal, or counts that go blank or stop updating. Some of this information is reported under Minn. Stat. 13.824 and some is voluntary, and withholding is not by itself a sign the cameras were removed or that the law was broken. It does make it harder for residents to see where the cameras are and how they are used. The underlying records can still be requested under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. -
Crystal PD removed from the MN BCA license plate reader roster
Removed from state LPR rosterCrystal Police Department no longer appears on the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension's roster of agencies that use license plate readers (dps.mn.gov, published under Minn. Stat. 13.824). The entry was present in the 2026-09-09 snapshot and gone by 2026-09-11; the live page confirmed its absence on 2026-09-11. The removed entry had listed five fixed or stationary device locations: Bass Lake Road at 58th Avenue North; 36th Avenue North at Welcome Avenue North; West Broadway at 47th Avenue North; Nevada Avenue North at 36th Avenue North; and West Broadway at 60th Avenue North. Its "other devices with LPR capability" field read N/A. This follows Chief Brian Hubbard's September 9, 2026 letter announcing the department had ended its Flock Safety ALPR program and removed its cameras (see the separate went-inactive entry). The BCA roster is vendor-neutral and covers every ALPR vendor, so the removal indicates Crystal PD has reported to the state that it no longer operates any license plate readers.
What does this mean?
The agency no longer appears on the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension's public list of agencies that operate automated license plate readers. This can mean the agency stopped using the technology, or simply that its reporting to the BCA lapsed or was revised. Removal from the roster does not confirm that cameras are gone or that collected data has been destroyed; under Minn. Stat. 13.824, plate reads not tied to an active investigation must be destroyed within 60 days, but an agency may still hold and share records beyond that for qualifying cases. -
Crystal PD ends its Flock ALPR program entirely
Went inactiveIn a public letter dated September 9, 2026, Chief Brian Hubbard announced Crystal PD has ended its use of Flock Safety ALPRs entirely, following a community information meeting and public feedback. Rather than pause the program, the department chose full separation: the 6 ALPR cameras have been physically removed and are being returned to Flock Safety, and all existing data sharing with other agencies has been turned off for the remainder of the current retention period.
What does this mean?
The agency's Flock program has stopped, either in part or for good. On the portal that usually shows up as an inactive listing or cameras that no longer report, and behind it is often a contract that was paused, allowed to lapse, or canceled outright. Agencies have ended their Flock relationship after a finished pilot, a budget decision, a council vote, or public pushback, and the same window often brings removals from other agencies' sharing lists. An inactive listing does not mean the cameras or the data are gone. Equipment can stay mounted, and plate reads already collected can stay on file, since Minn. Stat. 13.824 requires destruction within 60 days only for reads not connected to an active criminal investigation. -
Woodbury PD's BCA-disclosed license plate reader location list grew by three
Camera locations disclosedWoodbury PD's entry on the Minnesota BCA license plate reader roster now lists three more camera locations: - Bielenberg Drive at Stephens Way - Bielenberg Drive at Tamarack Road - Tamarack Road at Interstate 494 In the same edit, a garbled, duplicated entry ("Weir Drive at Tamarack Road southbound / Weir Drive at Valley Creek Road / Weir Drive at Tamarack Road") was cleaned up to a single "Weir Drive at Valley Creek Road" entry. Woodbury's own transparency portal, linked from its city ALPR page, identifies Flock as the vendor. Source: Minnesota BCA, "Agencies that use License Plate Readers (LPR)": https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/bca/data-and-reports/agencies-use-lprs-lpr
What does this mean?
The agency's entry on the Minnesota BCA's public roster of license plate reader users now names camera locations it did not list before. Minn. Stat. 13.824 requires agencies to report where their permanently mounted readers are, and the BCA publishes those locations. A newly listed location can mean a new camera went up, or an existing camera was reported for the first time; the roster does not say which. The roster covers every ALPR vendor, not just Flock Safety, so a listing does not by itself show which company's cameras are at a location. -
Stillwater PD's ALPR audit reported zero findings
Independent audit publishedIndependent audit by the Minnesota Security Consortium (MNSec) reported no findings across all statutory controls. A zero-findings result is the norm in Minnesota, where roughly four in five audits clear the agency, and it often reflects a checklist review rather than substantive oversight. The audit covered 17 stationary Flock units and a stated period of 8/1/24 to 7/31/26, though the same report says the department installed its Flock system in 2025 and never reconciles the two dates.
What does this mean?
Minn. Stat. 13.824 subd. 6 requires every agency that operates ALPRs to obtain an independent audit at least every two years, checking that data is properly classified, used only for authorized purposes, destroyed on schedule, and that each query had a documented reason, with results due to state officials within 30 days. The audit is one of the few outside checks on how an agency actually runs its cameras. In practice most Minnesota audits report zero findings, often on a boilerplate template that clears nearly every agency it reviews, so a clean audit usually reflects a light-touch review rather than proof the program meets the intent of the statute. FinePrint's ALPR Audit Watch tracks each agency's audit date, auditor, and findings count. - Camera(s) added
Maplewood PD's entry on the Minnesota BCA roster of agencies that use license plate readers went from listing no fixed devices ("N/A") to listing 17 fixed or stationary reader locations. The change was detected 2026-09-05; the previous snapshot with no locations was 2026-09-03. Locations as reported to the BCA: • White Bear Avenue North at County Road D East (northbound) • White Bear Avenue North at Cope Avenue East (northbound) • White Bear Avenue North at Gervais Avenue (southbound) • Minnesota Highway 61 North at County Road D East (southbound) • Minnesota Highway 61 North at County Road D East (northbound) • Frost Avenue at English Street (eastbound) • Minnesota Highway 61 North at Roselawn Avenue East (southbound) • Minnesota Highway 61 North at Roselawn Avenue East (northbound) • White Bear Avenue North at Larpenteur Avenue East (northbound) • White Bear Avenue North at Larpenteur Avenue East (southbound) • Stillwater Road East at Minnehaha Avenue East (southbound) • Larpenteur Avenue East at Interstate 35E Service Road (westbound) • McKnight Road North at Larpenteur Avenue East (northbound) • McKnight Road South at Lower Afton Road (northbound) • Century Avenue North at Brookview Drive (northbound) • Rice Street North at Larpenteur Avenue West (northbound) • Larpenteur Avenue West at Sylvan Street (westbound) The cameras appear to be installed but not in use. A City of Maplewood statement titled "Flock Safety Automated License Plate Readers" says the city does not currently have any active Flock cameras, that some equipment has been installed but is not collecting or storing data, and that the infrastructure would let the city activate the system later if it decides that is necessary for public safety. The same statement says the Maplewood Police Department is activating a public Flock transparency portal covering its policy, retention period, and sharing partners, and that the city does not share Flock data with ICE. No Maplewood portal has been found yet; when one goes live it will be logged as a separate update. Maplewood was already on the BCA roster before this change; only the location disclosure is new. The roster itself is vendor-neutral, but the city's statement confirms the equipment is Flock Safety. Sources: • BCA roster: https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/bca/data-and-reports/agencies-use-lprs-lpr • City of Maplewood statement: https://maplewoodmn.gov/DocumentCenter/View/38408/Flock-Safety-Automated-License-Plate-Readers
What does this mean?
The number of ALPR cameras the agency operates went up. Each camera photographs every passing vehicle and records its plate, make, model, and color, whether or not the vehicle is on a hotlist. Adding cameras puts more local roads under automated tracking, and Minnesota requires agencies to report stationary camera locations to the state BCA. -
Saint Paul PD stopped sharing with Crystal PD
Stopped sharing with an agencyCrystal MN PD was removed from the list of organizations granted access to Saint Paul Police Department (MN) data, taking the sharing list from 59 organizations to 58. It was deleted from the list entirely rather than tagged [Inactive]. Everything else on the portal was unchanged from the previous snapshot (2026-08-25): 1 fixed LPR location, 7-day retention, the same hotlist sources (NCMEC Amber Alert, FBI National Hotlist, MN BCA), and the same policy text. The change was detected 2026-09-05 and occurred sometime after 2026-08-25. This is the third monitored portal to drop Crystal in the same window — Paul Bunyan Task Force and Spring Lake Park PD both removed it on 2026-09-04 — which points to a change on Crystal's side rather than separate decisions by each portal owner. Crystal PD's own portal is not monitored, so it is not confirmed whether Crystal left the Flock network or only these sharing agreements ended.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Paul Bunyan Task Force stopped sharing with Crystal PD
Stopped sharing with an agencyCrystal MN PD was removed from the list of organizations granted access to Paul Bunyan Task Force MN data, taking the task force's sharing network from 65 organizations to 64. Crystal had been added to the list on 2026-07-31, so the sharing relationship lasted about five weeks. It was deleted from the list entirely rather than tagged [Inactive]. Everything else on the portal was unchanged from the previous snapshot (2026-08-26): 22 cameras, 30-day retention, the same hotlist sources (NCMEC Amber Alert, MN BCA), and the same policy text. Brooklyn Park MN PD and Columbia Heights MN PD remain flagged inactive. Crystal PD's own portal is not monitored, so it is not confirmed whether Crystal left the Flock network or only this sharing agreement ended; no other monitored portal reported a Crystal change in the same window.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Spring Lake Park PD stopped sharing with Crystal PD
Stopped sharing with an agencyCrystal MN PD was removed from the list of organizations granted access to Spring Lake Park MN PD data, taking the sharing list from 54 organizations to 53. It was deleted from the list entirely rather than tagged [Inactive]. Everything else on the portal was unchanged from the previous snapshot (2026-08-23): 2 cameras, 30-day retention, the same hotlist sources (NCMEC Amber Alert, MN BCA), and the same policy text. Brooklyn Park MN PD and Columbia Heights MN PD remain flagged inactive. Crystal was also removed from the Paul Bunyan Task Force sharing list in the same window (logged 2026-09-04), which points to a change on Crystal's side rather than separate decisions by each portal owner. Crystal PD's own portal is not monitored, so it is not confirmed whether Crystal left the Flock network or only these sharing agreements ended.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Crow Wing County SO stopped disclosing its license plate reader locations on the state roster
Reduced TransparencyCrow Wing County Sheriff's Office replaced the list of camera locations on its Minnesota BCA license plate reader roster entry with this statement: "Locations (4) withheld by the sheriff's office under Minnesota Statute 13.824, Subdivision 8 (b)." The ten locations it had previously published: - State Highway 371 and Oak Drive South, Fort Ripley - State Highway 371 and Ariell Drive, Brainerd - County Road 3 and County Road 49, Brainerd - County Road 11 and Knotty Pine Road, Pequot Lakes - State Highway 371 and 3rd Street, Jenkins - State Highway 6 and Dahler Avenue, Emily - County Road 12 and County Road 8, Deerwood - State Highway 169 and County Road 138, Garrison - 26975 County Road 2, Garrison - 35507 County Road 3, Cross Lake The new entry cites four withheld locations, against ten previously disclosed. The roster does not show whether the office removed six cameras or is reporting differently. Source: Minnesota BCA, "Agencies that use License Plate Readers (LPR)": https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/bca/data-and-reports/agencies-use-lprs-lpr
What does this mean?
The agency now discloses less about its license plate readers than it did before. That can mean camera locations withheld from the state BCA roster, metrics or policy details removed from its Flock transparency portal, or counts that go blank or stop updating. Some of this information is reported under Minn. Stat. 13.824 and some is voluntary, and withholding is not by itself a sign the cameras were removed or that the law was broken. It does make it harder for residents to see where the cameras are and how they are used. The underlying records can still be requested under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. -
Hennepin County Sheriff's Office dropped a license plate reader location from the state roster
Camera locations removedHennepin County Sheriff's Office's entry on the Minnesota BCA license plate reader roster now lists one camera location, down from two. No longer listed: - Fremont Avenue N. at Dowling Avenue N., Minneapolis Still listed: - Penn Avenue at 40th Street, Minneapolis Source: Minnesota BCA, "Agencies that use License Plate Readers (LPR)": https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/bca/data-and-reports/agencies-use-lprs-lpr
What does this mean?
One or more camera locations no longer appear on the agency's entry in the Minnesota BCA's public roster of license plate reader users. A dropped location can mean a camera was taken down or moved, or that the listing was only edited; the roster does not say which. Plate reads already collected can stay on file, since Minn. Stat. 13.824 requires destruction within 60 days only for reads not tied to an active investigation. The roster covers every ALPR vendor, not just Flock Safety. -
Renville County Sheriff's Office removed from Minnesota's state license plate reader roster
Removed from state LPR rosterThe Renville County Sheriff's Office no longer appears on the BCA's published list of Minnesota agencies that report using automated license plate readers under Minn. Stat. 13.824. Its entry previously listed three fixed device locations: State Highway 71 on the Redwood/Renville County line near Morton, State Highway 212 at 570th Street in Stewart, and West Lincoln Avenue at 26th Street in Olivia. On the roster the agency sat between Red Wing PD and Richfield PD; those two entries are now adjacent. The state roster is vendor-neutral — it covers every ALPR vendor, not only Flock — and Renville County's vendor is not confirmed. Separately, on Aug. 23 the agency dropped off the outbound sharing lists of the Paul Bunyan Task Force and Spring Lake Park PD Flock portals.
What does this mean?
The agency no longer appears on the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension's public list of agencies that operate automated license plate readers. This can mean the agency stopped using the technology, or simply that its reporting to the BCA lapsed or was revised. Removal from the roster does not confirm that cameras are gone or that collected data has been destroyed; under Minn. Stat. 13.824, plate reads not tied to an active investigation must be destroyed within 60 days, but an agency may still hold and share records beyond that for qualifying cases. -
St. Paul PD stopped disclosing any license plate reader locations on the state roster
Camera locations removedSt. Paul PD's entry on the Minnesota BCA license plate reader roster no longer names any camera locations. The field now reads "N/A." It previously listed: - Kellogg Boulevard at Smith Avenue North (2) The field for other surveillance devices with license plate reading capability still reads "N/A." The day before, on August 26, 2026, the mayor and police chief announced that the city's two city-owned Flock cameras would be removed. Source: Minnesota BCA, "Agencies that use License Plate Readers (LPR)": https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/bca/data-and-reports/agencies-use-lprs-lpr
What does this mean?
One or more camera locations no longer appear on the agency's entry in the Minnesota BCA's public roster of license plate reader users. A dropped location can mean a camera was taken down or moved, or that the listing was only edited; the roster does not say which. Plate reads already collected can stay on file, since Minn. Stat. 13.824 requires destruction within 60 days only for reads not tied to an active investigation. The roster covers every ALPR vendor, not just Flock Safety. -
St. Paul PD announced it will remove its two city-owned Flock cameras
OtherAfter a City Council meeting on Wednesday, August 26, 2026, Mayor Kaohly Her and the police chief announced that the city's two city-owned Flock cameras would be taken down. KSTP reports the council voted unanimously on a resolution. Ramsey County Sheriff Bob Fletcher said the county's 10 cameras in St. Paul will stay, because the resolution does not require his office to remove them. The articles published August 26-27 do not give a removal date for the two city cameras. Sources: KSTP (kstp.com, Aug 26, 2026); CBS Minnesota (cbsnews.com/minnesota, Aug 27, 2026).
What does this mean?
A change that does not fit the standard categories. See the update's details for specifics. -
Paul Bunyan Task Force stopped sharing with Dakota County SO and Renville County SO
Stopped sharing with an agencyDakota County MN SO and Renville County SO were removed from the list of organizations granted access to Paul Bunyan Task Force MN data. Camera count (22), 30-day retention, hotlist sources (NCMEC Amber Alert, MN BCA) and the portal's policy text were unchanged from the previous snapshot (2026-08-19). The same two removals appeared on the Spring Lake Park PD portal in the same detection window, which points to a change on Dakota County's and Renville County's side rather than separate decisions by each portal owner. Both were deleted from the list entirely rather than tagged [Inactive]. Neither agency's own portal is monitored, so it is not confirmed whether they left the Flock network or only ended these sharing agreements.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Paul Bunyan Task Force updated its linked Beltrami County SO ALPR policy to the 2026 policy manual
Usage/access policy changedThe "Beltrami County SO Policy" link in the portal's More Info section changed from an older PDF on the county's previous website (co.beltrami.mn.us) to the 2026 BCSO Policy Manual on the county's current site (beltramicountymn.gov/media/wpchq1rb/2026-bcso-policy-manual.pdf). The ALPR policy text published on the portal itself was unchanged; only the linked full-policy document moved and now points to the 2026 edition of the manual.
What does this mean?
The agency changed the written rules for how its cameras and data may be used, including who can run a search, what justification is required, and how access is logged. Minn. Stat. 13.824 limits ALPR use to legitimate law enforcement purposes and requires a recorded audit trail of every query, so policy edits can widen or narrow surveillance even when the cameras stay the same. -
Spring Lake Park PD stopped sharing with Dakota County SO and Renville County SO
Stopped sharing with an agencyDakota County MN SO and Renville County SO were removed from the list of organizations granted access to Spring Lake Park MN PD data. The rest of the portal - 2 cameras, 30-day retention, hotlist sources (NCMEC Amber Alert, MN BCA) and all policy text - was unchanged from the previous snapshot (2026-08-18). The same two removals appeared on the Paul Bunyan Task Force portal in the same detection window, which points to a change on Dakota County's and Renville County's side rather than separate decisions by each portal owner. Unlike Brooklyn Park and Columbia Heights, which remain on the list tagged [Inactive], both were deleted from the list entirely. Neither agency's own portal is monitored, so it is not confirmed whether they left the Flock network or only ended these sharing agreements.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Caledonia PD added to Minnesota's state license plate reader roster
Added to state LPR rosterThe Caledonia Police Department was added to the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension's public list of agencies that use automated license plate readers, observed on August 19, 2026. The department lists no cameras and has no Flock transparency portal. The BCA roster covers all ALPR vendors, so Caledonia's vendor has not been confirmed as Flock. Source: Minnesota BCA, "Agencies that use License Plate Readers (LPR)."
What does this mean?
The agency was added to the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension's public list of law enforcement agencies that operate automated license plate readers. Minn. Stat. 13.824 requires agencies using ALPR to report that use to the BCA, including the locations of any stationary cameras, and the BCA must publish the roster. A new listing is often the earliest public sign that an agency has started using the technology, sometimes appearing before any transparency portal exists. The roster covers every ALPR vendor, not just Flock Safety, so a listing alone does not establish which system an agency uses. -
Hennepin County Sheriff's Office went from 4 to 2 cameras
Camera(s) removedThe portal's Total Cameras count dropped from 4 to 2. Everything else on the portal — 30-day retention, hotlist sources (NCMEC Amber Alert, MN BCA), and the acceptable use, prohibited use, access and hotlist policies — was unchanged from the previous snapshot (2026-07-29).
What does this mean?
The agency's camera count went down. Cameras may have been moved, decommissioned, or pulled after a pilot. A lower count does not by itself undo earlier data sharing, because plate reads already collected can stay on file until the 60-day destruction deadline in Minn. Stat. 13.824. -
Paul Bunyan Task Force stopped sharing with South St. Paul PD
Stopped sharing with an agencySouth Saint Paul MN PD was removed from the list of organizations granted access to Paul Bunyan Task Force MN data, taking the task force's sharing network from 68 organizations to 67. Everything else on the portal was unchanged: 22 cameras, 30-day retention, the same hotlist sources (NCMEC Amber Alert, MN BCA), and the same acceptable use, prohibited use, access and hotlist policy text. Two partners on the list remain flagged inactive (Brooklyn Park MN PD and Columbia Heights MN PD). South St. Paul was also removed from Spring Lake Park PD's sharing list within the same 24-hour window, which points to a change on South St. Paul's side rather than two separate decisions; unlike Brooklyn Park and Columbia Heights it was deleted from the list entirely rather than tagged [Inactive]. South St. Paul PD's own transparency portal could not be checked during this run, so its status has been left as Active pending verification.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Spring Lake Park PD stopped sharing with South St. Paul PD
Stopped sharing with an agencySouth Saint Paul MN PD was removed from the list of organizations granted access to Spring Lake Park MN PD data, leaving 55 partner agencies. The rest of the portal — 2 cameras, 30-day retention, hotlist sources and policy text — was unchanged from the previous snapshot (2026-07-28).
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
St. Louis Park PD lost inbound data access from Robbinsdale PD
Stopped sharing with an agencyRobbinsdale MN PD no longer appears under "Receiving Network Data From" on the St. Louis Park MN PD transparency portal, meaning Robbinsdale has stopped sharing its Flock data with St. Louis Park. St. Louis Park still lists Robbinsdale MN PD under "Sharing Network Data With," so the relationship is now one-directional: St. Louis Park shares out to Robbinsdale but no longer receives Robbinsdale data. No other sharing-list entries changed.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
St. Paul PD's Flock transparency portal went live
Portal went liveThe St. Paul Police Department's Flock transparency portal became publicly available and was first observed on August 12, 2026. Flock does not publish portal launch dates; the portal is understood to have gone live during the first week of August 2026. St. Paul PD also appears on the Minnesota BCA's public roster of agencies that use license plate readers.
What does this mean?
Flock Safety publishes a public transparency portal for each agency that uses its automated license plate reader (ALPR) cameras. A new portal usually means the agency has signed a Flock contract and begun deploying cameras, or has started disclosing an existing deployment. Minnesota law (Minn. Stat. 13.824) requires agencies to log their ALPR use and notify the state BCA, which keeps a public list of agencies that operate the cameras. -
Anoka County Sheriff's Office stopped sharing with Middleton WI PD
Stopped sharing with an agencyMiddleton WI PD was removed from the list of organizations granted access to Anoka County Sheriff's Office data. The same removal appeared on the Alexandria PD and Stillwater PD portals in the same 24-hour window, and Middleton WI PD also dropped off Medina PD's inbound list, which suggests Middleton left the Flock network rather than each Minnesota agency ending the relationship separately.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Alexandria PD stopped sharing with Middleton WI PD
Stopped sharing with an agencyMiddleton WI PD was removed from the list of organizations granted access to Alexandria PD data. The same removal appeared on the Anoka County Sheriff's Office and Stillwater PD portals in the same 24-hour window, and Middleton WI PD also dropped off Medina PD's inbound list.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Medina PD lost inbound data access from three out-of-state agencies
Stopped sharing with an agencyThree agencies were removed from the list of organizations sharing their data with Medina PD: Fargo ND PD, Kewaskum WI PD, and Middleton WI PD. Middleton WI PD was also removed the same day from the outbound sharing lists of Anoka County Sheriff's Office, Alexandria PD, and Stillwater PD.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Stillwater PD stopped sharing with Middleton WI PD
Stopped sharing with an agencyMiddleton WI PD was removed from the list of organizations granted access to Stillwater PD data. The same removal appeared on the Anoka County Sheriff's Office and Alexandria PD portals in the same 24-hour window, and Middleton WI PD also dropped off Medina PD's inbound list.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Anoka County Sheriff's Office started sharing with Brooklyn Center PD
Started sharing with a new agencyBrooklyn Center MN PD was added to the list of organizations granted access to Anoka County Sheriff's Office ALPR data. It was the only change in the snapshot — camera count (13), 30-day retention, hotlist sources (NCMEC Amber Alert, MN BCA) and all policy text were unchanged.
What does this mean?
The agency added another law enforcement agency to its sharing network, letting that agency search its plate data. Minn. Stat. 13.824 allows sharing for legitimate law enforcement purposes and requires any agency that receives the data to follow the same retention and security rules, but each new partner widens who can see where local drivers have been. -
Paul Bunyan Task Force started sharing with Crystal PD
Started sharing with a new agencyCrystal MN PD was added to the list of organizations granted access to Paul Bunyan Task Force MN data, bringing the task force's sharing network from 67 to 68 organizations. Every other field on the portal was unchanged: 22 cameras, 30-day retention, the same hotlist sources (NCMEC Amber Alert, MN BCA), and the same policy text. Two partners on the list remain flagged inactive (Brooklyn Park MN PD and Columbia Heights MN PD).
What does this mean?
The agency added another law enforcement agency to its sharing network, letting that agency search its plate data. Minn. Stat. 13.824 allows sharing for legitimate law enforcement purposes and requires any agency that receives the data to follow the same retention and security rules, but each new partner widens who can see where local drivers have been. -
Brooklyn Center PD stopped sharing with West St. Paul PD
Stopped sharing with an agencyWest Saint Paul MN PD was removed from Brooklyn Center PD's "Sharing Network Data With" list, ending West St. Paul's access to Brooklyn Center camera data.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Brooklyn Center PD gained access to data from four more Minnesota agencies
New agency gained accessBrooklyn Center MN PD was added to the "Sharing Network Data With" list (organizations granted access to that agency's data) on four Minnesota transparency portals within about 24 hours: Anoka PD, Blaine PD, Medina PD, and West Hennepin Public Safety Department. Each of those agencies now grants Brooklyn Center access to its camera data. Logged as one event, observed across four portals.
What does this mean?
Another agency was granted the ability to search this agency's data, or this agency was added to a partner's network and can now search another jurisdiction's plate reads. Inbound access expands what a department can surveil beyond its own borders. Under Minn. Stat. 13.824, an agency that receives shared data must apply the same classification and destruction rules. -
Medina PD lost inbound data access from Minnetonka PD
Stopped sharing with an agencyMinnetonka MN PD was removed from the "Receiving Network Data From" list on Medina PD's transparency portal, ending the flow of Minnetonka camera data into Medina. Medina PD still appears to grant Minnetonka access to its own data, so the change is one-directional.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Paul Bunyan Task Force stopped sharing with Roseville PD
Stopped sharing with an agencyRoseville MN PD was removed from the list of organizations granted access to Paul Bunyan Task Force data, taking the task force's sharing network from 68 organizations to 67. Every other entry on the list was unchanged, including the two partners already flagged inactive (Brooklyn Park MN PD and Columbia Heights MN PD). Roseville is not itself shutting down its program: it still appears on Mounds View PD's sharing list on the same day, so this is a revoked sharing relationship rather than an agency going inactive.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Alexandria PD stopped sharing with Elmhurst IL PD and Macon County NC SO
Stopped sharing with an agencyTwo out-of-state agencies were removed from Alexandria PD's sharing list: Elmhurst PD (IL) and Macon County Sheriff's Office (NC). This continues a run of out-of-state partners coming off the Alexandria list through July.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Anoka County Sheriff's Office started sharing with the Missouri Department of Conservation
Started sharing with a new agencyThe Missouri Department of Conservation was added to the agencies the Anoka County Sheriff's Office shares its Flock data with — a state wildlife/conservation agency roughly 500 miles away, not a Minnesota law enforcement partner.
What does this mean?
The agency added another law enforcement agency to its sharing network, letting that agency search its plate data. Minn. Stat. 13.824 allows sharing for legitimate law enforcement purposes and requires any agency that receives the data to follow the same retention and security rules, but each new partner widens who can see where local drivers have been. -
Anoka County Sheriff's Office stopped sharing with Elmhurst IL PD
Stopped sharing with an agencyElmhurst PD (IL) was removed from the agencies the Anoka County Sheriff's Office shares its Flock data with. Elmhurst was dropped from three Minnesota portals the same day (Anoka County SO, Alexandria PD, Stillwater PD).
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Blaine PD moved its ALPR policy off the city website
Usage/access policy changedThe "Full ALPR Policy" link on Blaine PD's transparency portal changed from the city's own site (blainemn.gov/ALPR) to a third-party policy-hosting platform (blai-pd-mn.magnusone.tech). The policy text published on the portal itself was unchanged; only the link to the full policy moved.
What does this mean?
The agency changed the written rules for how its cameras and data may be used, including who can run a search, what justification is required, and how access is logged. Minn. Stat. 13.824 limits ALPR use to legitimate law enforcement purposes and requires a recorded audit trail of every query, so policy edits can widen or narrow surveillance even when the cameras stay the same. -
Blaine PD stopped sharing with Mille Lacs County Sheriff's Office
Stopped sharing with an agencyThe Mille Lacs County Sheriff's Office (MN) was removed from Blaine PD's sharing list. Mille Lacs County came off three Minnesota portals the same day (Blaine PD, Mounds View PD, Plymouth PD).
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Brooklyn Center PD stopped sharing with Wyoming MN PD
Stopped sharing with an agencyWyoming PD (Wyoming, Minnesota) was removed from Brooklyn Center PD's sharing list.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Medina PD lost inbound data access from Woodbury (MN)
Stopped sharing with an agencyWoodbury (MN) was removed from the list of organizations sharing Flock data with Medina PD, so Medina no longer receives Woodbury's detections.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Mounds View PD stopped sharing with four more agencies
Stopped sharing with an agencyFour agencies were removed from Mounds View PD's sharing list: Crow Wing County Sheriff's Office (MN), Mille Lacs County Sheriff's Office (MN), Springfield PD (MO), and West Des Moines PD (IA). Two of the four were out of state.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Plymouth PD stopped sharing with four more agencies
Stopped sharing with an agencyFour agencies were removed from Plymouth PD's sharing list: Mille Lacs County Sheriff's Office (MN), Sherburne County Sheriff's Office (MN), and two departments already flagged inactive on the portal, Brooklyn Park PD (MN) and Columbia Heights PD (MN). The two inactive entries look like cleanup of departments that have already dropped Flock.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Stillwater PD stopped sharing with five more agencies, including two HIDTA task forces
Stopped sharing with an agencyFive agencies were removed from Stillwater PD's sharing list: HIDTA Indiana, Midwest HIDTA, Elmhurst PD (IL), Macon County Sheriff's Office (NC), and Mohave County Sheriff's Office (AZ). HIDTA (High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area) task forces are federally funded multi-agency programs, so these two removals cut Stillwater's data off from federal drug-task-force channels.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Alexandria PD stopped sharing with Mohave County AZ SO
Stopped sharing with an agencyThe Mohave County Sheriff's Office (AZ) was removed from the list of organizations granted access to Alexandria PD data. Camera count (11) and data retention (30 days) were unchanged.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Anoka County Sheriff's Office started sharing with two more agencies
Started sharing with a new agencyBegan sharing with two additional agencies: Clinton County Sheriff's Office (IA) and University of Missouri Campus PD (MO). Camera count (13) and data retention (30 days) were unchanged.
What does this mean?
The agency added another law enforcement agency to its sharing network, letting that agency search its plate data. Minn. Stat. 13.824 allows sharing for legitimate law enforcement purposes and requires any agency that receives the data to follow the same retention and security rules, but each new partner widens who can see where local drivers have been. -
Brooklyn Park PD stopped sharing with Crystal PD
Stopped sharing with an agencyCrystal PD (MN) was removed from the list of organizations granted access to Brooklyn Park PD data. Brooklyn Park's portal has shown as inactive with 0 cameras since at least 2026-06-21; its sharing list remains published and is still being amended.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Alexandria PD stopped sharing with Kaukauna PD (WI)
Stopped sharing with an agencyKaukauna PD (WI) was removed from the list of organizations granted access to Alexandria PD data. No other portal fields changed: camera count held at 11, retention at 30 days, and hotlist sources at NCMEC Amber Alert and MN BCA. The same removal appeared on the Anoka County Sheriff's Office and Stillwater PD portals on the same day, which suggests a change on Kaukauna's side rather than three separate Minnesota decisions.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Anoka County Sheriff's Office stopped sharing with Kaukauna PD (WI)
Stopped sharing with an agencyKaukauna PD (WI) was removed from the list of organizations granted access to Anoka County Sheriff's Office data. No other portal fields changed: camera count held at 13, retention at 30 days, and hotlist sources at NCMEC Amber Alert and MN BCA. The same removal appeared on the Alexandria PD and Stillwater PD portals on the same day, which suggests a change on Kaukauna's side rather than three separate Minnesota decisions.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Stillwater PD stopped sharing with Kaukauna PD (WI)
Stopped sharing with an agencyKaukauna PD (WI) was removed from the list of organizations granted access to Stillwater PD data. No other portal fields changed: 17 LPR cameras and 20 live video cameras held steady, retention at 30 days, and hotlist sources at NCMEC Amber Alert and MN BCA. The same removal appeared on the Alexandria PD and Anoka County Sheriff's Office portals on the same day, which suggests a change on Kaukauna's side rather than three separate Minnesota decisions.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Anoka County Sheriff's Office stopped sharing with Prescott PD (WI)
Stopped sharing with an agencyPrescott PD (WI) was removed from the list of organizations granted access to Anoka County Sheriff's Office data ("Sharing Network Data With"). Detected 2026-07-11 against the previous portal snapshot of 2026-07-02. Camera count (13), data retention (30 days), and hotlist sources were unchanged. The same removal appeared on the portals of Mounds View PD, Stillwater PD, and South St. Paul PD on the same day.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Mounds View PD stopped sharing with Prescott PD (WI)
Stopped sharing with an agencyPrescott PD (WI) was removed from the list of organizations granted access to Mounds View PD's Flock data ("Sharing Network Data With"). The previous portal snapshot (June 21, 2026) still listed Prescott WI PD; the change was detected July 11, 2026. No other structural changes — cameras remained at 10 and data retention at 30 days.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
South St. Paul PD stopped sharing with Prescott PD (WI)
Stopped sharing with an agencyPrescott PD (WI) was removed from the list of organizations granted access to South St. Paul PD's Flock data ("Sharing Network Data With"). Detected 2026-07-11 against the previous portal snapshot of 2026-06-09. Camera count (9) and data retention (30 days) were unchanged. The same removal appeared on the portals of Mounds View PD, Stillwater PD, and Anoka County SO on the same day.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Stillwater PD stopped sharing with Prescott PD (WI)
Stopped sharing with an agencyPrescott PD (WI) was removed from the list of organizations granted access to Stillwater PD's Flock data ("Sharing Network Data With"). Detected 2026-07-11 against the previous portal snapshot of 2026-07-02; no other portal fields changed (data retention remained 30 days). The same removal appeared on the portals of Mounds View PD, Anoka County SO, and South St. Paul PD on the same day, indicating Prescott PD (WI) dropped out of the shared Flock network.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Anoka County Sheriff's Office stopped sharing with four more out-of-state agencies
Stopped sharing with an agencyFour agencies were removed from the sheriff's office's outbound sharing list: Appleton PD (WI), Flint PD (MI), Jefferson City PD (MO), and Jefferson County Sheriff's Office (MO). This follows the removal of roughly 70 out-of-state agencies from the same list a day earlier. Appleton PD (WI) was also removed from Stillwater PD's sharing list the same day.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Blaine PD started sharing with Hopkins PD
Started sharing with a new agencyHopkins PD (MN) was added to the list of organizations granted access to Blaine PD's Flock data. All other portal fields, including the camera count (31), were unchanged.
What does this mean?
The agency added another law enforcement agency to its sharing network, letting that agency search its plate data. Minn. Stat. 13.824 allows sharing for legitimate law enforcement purposes and requires any agency that receives the data to follow the same retention and security rules, but each new partner widens who can see where local drivers have been. -
Stillwater PD stopped sharing with Appleton WI PD
Stopped sharing with an agencyAppleton PD (WI) was removed from the list of organizations granted access to Stillwater PD's Flock data. Detected 2026-07-02 against the previous snapshot of 2026-06-27; no other portal fields changed.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Anoka County Sheriff's Office stopped sharing with 70 out-of-state agencies
Stopped sharing with an agencyAnoka County Sheriff's Office removed 70 agencies from its "Sharing Network Data With" list (organizations granted access to Anoka County SO data). All 70 are outside Minnesota, spanning roughly 25 states. Removed (as listed on the portal): Adrian MI PD; Allen County IN SO; AR - Alma PD; Bourbon County KS SO; Braintree MA PD; Burton MI PD; Butler Township PA PD; Byron GA PD; Cabot AR PD; Carmel IN PD; Chase County KS SO; Coffeyville KS PD; Crowley TX PD; Cullman County AL SO; Cumberland Metro IN PD; Davison Township MI PD; Dearborn MI PD; Decatur IN PD; El Cajon CA PD; Fishers IN PD; Fort Wayne IN PD; Franklin IN PD; Gas City IN PD; Glendale OH PD; Grand Blanc Twp MI PD; Grant County IN SO; Greene County IN SO; Greene County MO SO; Hamburg Township MI PD (Livingston County); Harrison County IN SO; Harvey County KS SO; Hazel Park MI PD; Hillsborough County FL SO; IN - Tipton County SO; Independence KS PD; Indiana HIDTA; Indiana State Police; Jonesboro AR PD; Lee County GA SO; Macon County NC SO; Marion Health PD (IN); Marion IN PD; Markle IN PD; Marshall TX PD; Mauldin SC PD; Milford MI PD; Nassau County NY PD; New Haven IN PD; Newton County MS SO; Oxford MS PD; Oxford PD - OH; Palm Springs CA PD; Pittsboro IN PD; Pittsburg KS PD; Purcell OK PD; Putnam County GA SO; Puyallup WA PD; Republic MO PD; Seymour IN PD; St. Francois County MO SO; Sterling Heights MI PD; Sun Valley PD ID; Tampa FL PD; Taylor MI PD; Tulsa County OK SO; Utah County UT SO - Vineyard PD; Village of Clearview WV PD; Whitestown IN PD; Wichita Falls TX PD; Woodlawn OH PD. No agencies were added. Camera count (13), data retention (30 days), and hotlist sources were unchanged. Change occurred between portal snapshots of 2026-06-27 and 2026-07-01.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Anoka County Sheriff's Office started sharing with Sugar Creek MO PD
Started sharing with a new agencyAnoka County Sheriff's Office added the Sugar Creek Police Department (MO) to its "Sharing Network Data With" list (organizations granted access to Anoka County SO data).
What does this mean?
The agency added another law enforcement agency to its sharing network, letting that agency search its plate data. Minn. Stat. 13.824 allows sharing for legitimate law enforcement purposes and requires any agency that receives the data to follow the same retention and security rules, but each new partner widens who can see where local drivers have been. -
St. Louis Park PD cut data retention from 60 to 30 days
Data-retention period changedThe portal's data retention period changed from 60 days to 30 days.
What does this mean?
The number of days the agency keeps plate reads changed. Minn. Stat. 13.824 requires ALPR data not linked to an active criminal investigation to be destroyed within 60 days, so a general retention period above 60 days conflicts with state law. A longer window leaves a deeper searchable history of drivers' movements, and a shorter one limits how far back a query can reach. -
Stillwater PD stopped sharing with Fort Collins Police Services
Stopped sharing with an agencyStillwater PD removed Fort Collins Police Services (FCPS) (CO) from its "Sharing Network Data With" list (organizations granted access to Stillwater PD data).
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
University of Minnesota PD went from 11 to 12 cameras
Camera(s) addedThe portal's camera count increased from 11 to 12.
What does this mean?
The number of ALPR cameras the agency operates went up. Each camera photographs every passing vehicle and records its plate, make, model, and color, whether or not the vehicle is on a hotlist. Adding cameras puts more local roads under automated tracking, and Minnesota requires agencies to report stationary camera locations to the state BCA. -
University of Minnesota PD went from 10 to 11 cameras
Camera(s) addedThe portal's camera count increased from 10 to 11.
What does this mean?
The number of ALPR cameras the agency operates went up. Each camera photographs every passing vehicle and records its plate, make, model, and color, whether or not the vehicle is on a hotlist. Adding cameras puts more local roads under automated tracking, and Minnesota requires agencies to report stationary camera locations to the state BCA. -
South St. Paul PD started sharing with five more agencies
Started sharing with a new agencyBegan sharing with five additional agencies: Belle Plaine PD (MN), Dayton PD (MN), New Richmond PD (WI), Sherburne County Sheriff's Office (MN), and South Lake Minnetonka PD (MN).
What does this mean?
The agency added another law enforcement agency to its sharing network, letting that agency search its plate data. Minn. Stat. 13.824 allows sharing for legitimate law enforcement purposes and requires any agency that receives the data to follow the same retention and security rules, but each new partner widens who can see where local drivers have been.