All changes · Page 5 of 6
-
Alexandria PD stopped sharing with Mohave County AZ SO
Stopped sharing with an agencyThe Mohave County Sheriff's Office (AZ) was removed from the list of organizations granted access to Alexandria PD data. Camera count (11) and data retention (30 days) were unchanged.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Anoka County Sheriff's Office started sharing with two more agencies
Started sharing with a new agencyBegan sharing with two additional agencies: Clinton County Sheriff's Office (IA) and University of Missouri Campus PD (MO). Camera count (13) and data retention (30 days) were unchanged.
What does this mean?
The agency added another law enforcement agency to its sharing network, letting that agency search its plate data. Minn. Stat. 13.824 allows sharing for legitimate law enforcement purposes and requires any agency that receives the data to follow the same retention and security rules, but each new partner widens who can see where local drivers have been. -
Brooklyn Park PD stopped sharing with Crystal PD
Stopped sharing with an agencyCrystal PD (MN) was removed from the list of organizations granted access to Brooklyn Park PD data. Brooklyn Park's portal has shown as inactive with 0 cameras since at least 2026-06-21; its sharing list remains published and is still being amended.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Alexandria PD stopped sharing with Kaukauna PD (WI)
Stopped sharing with an agencyKaukauna PD (WI) was removed from the list of organizations granted access to Alexandria PD data. No other portal fields changed: camera count held at 11, retention at 30 days, and hotlist sources at NCMEC Amber Alert and MN BCA. The same removal appeared on the Anoka County Sheriff's Office and Stillwater PD portals on the same day, which suggests a change on Kaukauna's side rather than three separate Minnesota decisions.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Anoka County Sheriff's Office stopped sharing with Kaukauna PD (WI)
Stopped sharing with an agencyKaukauna PD (WI) was removed from the list of organizations granted access to Anoka County Sheriff's Office data. No other portal fields changed: camera count held at 13, retention at 30 days, and hotlist sources at NCMEC Amber Alert and MN BCA. The same removal appeared on the Alexandria PD and Stillwater PD portals on the same day, which suggests a change on Kaukauna's side rather than three separate Minnesota decisions.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Stillwater PD stopped sharing with Kaukauna PD (WI)
Stopped sharing with an agencyKaukauna PD (WI) was removed from the list of organizations granted access to Stillwater PD data. No other portal fields changed: 17 LPR cameras and 20 live video cameras held steady, retention at 30 days, and hotlist sources at NCMEC Amber Alert and MN BCA. The same removal appeared on the Alexandria PD and Anoka County Sheriff's Office portals on the same day, which suggests a change on Kaukauna's side rather than three separate Minnesota decisions.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Anoka County Sheriff's Office stopped sharing with Prescott PD (WI)
Stopped sharing with an agencyPrescott PD (WI) was removed from the list of organizations granted access to Anoka County Sheriff's Office data ("Sharing Network Data With"). Detected 2026-07-11 against the previous portal snapshot of 2026-07-02. Camera count (13), data retention (30 days), and hotlist sources were unchanged. The same removal appeared on the portals of Mounds View PD, Stillwater PD, and South St. Paul PD on the same day.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Mounds View PD stopped sharing with Prescott PD (WI)
Stopped sharing with an agencyPrescott PD (WI) was removed from the list of organizations granted access to Mounds View PD's Flock data ("Sharing Network Data With"). The previous portal snapshot (June 21, 2026) still listed Prescott WI PD; the change was detected July 11, 2026. No other structural changes — cameras remained at 10 and data retention at 30 days.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
South St. Paul PD stopped sharing with Prescott PD (WI)
Stopped sharing with an agencyPrescott PD (WI) was removed from the list of organizations granted access to South St. Paul PD's Flock data ("Sharing Network Data With"). Detected 2026-07-11 against the previous portal snapshot of 2026-06-09. Camera count (9) and data retention (30 days) were unchanged. The same removal appeared on the portals of Mounds View PD, Stillwater PD, and Anoka County SO on the same day.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Stillwater PD stopped sharing with Prescott PD (WI)
Stopped sharing with an agencyPrescott PD (WI) was removed from the list of organizations granted access to Stillwater PD's Flock data ("Sharing Network Data With"). Detected 2026-07-11 against the previous portal snapshot of 2026-07-02; no other portal fields changed (data retention remained 30 days). The same removal appeared on the portals of Mounds View PD, Anoka County SO, and South St. Paul PD on the same day, indicating Prescott PD (WI) dropped out of the shared Flock network.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Anoka County Sheriff's Office stopped sharing with four more out-of-state agencies
Stopped sharing with an agencyFour agencies were removed from the sheriff's office's outbound sharing list: Appleton PD (WI), Flint PD (MI), Jefferson City PD (MO), and Jefferson County Sheriff's Office (MO). This follows the removal of roughly 70 out-of-state agencies from the same list a day earlier. Appleton PD (WI) was also removed from Stillwater PD's sharing list the same day.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Blaine PD started sharing with Hopkins PD
Started sharing with a new agencyHopkins PD (MN) was added to the list of organizations granted access to Blaine PD's Flock data. All other portal fields, including the camera count (31), were unchanged.
What does this mean?
The agency added another law enforcement agency to its sharing network, letting that agency search its plate data. Minn. Stat. 13.824 allows sharing for legitimate law enforcement purposes and requires any agency that receives the data to follow the same retention and security rules, but each new partner widens who can see where local drivers have been. -
Stillwater PD stopped sharing with Appleton WI PD
Stopped sharing with an agencyAppleton PD (WI) was removed from the list of organizations granted access to Stillwater PD's Flock data. Detected 2026-07-02 against the previous snapshot of 2026-06-27; no other portal fields changed.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Anoka County Sheriff's Office stopped sharing with 70 out-of-state agencies
Stopped sharing with an agencyAnoka County Sheriff's Office removed 70 agencies from its "Sharing Network Data With" list (organizations granted access to Anoka County SO data). All 70 are outside Minnesota, spanning roughly 25 states. Removed (as listed on the portal): Adrian MI PD; Allen County IN SO; AR - Alma PD; Bourbon County KS SO; Braintree MA PD; Burton MI PD; Butler Township PA PD; Byron GA PD; Cabot AR PD; Carmel IN PD; Chase County KS SO; Coffeyville KS PD; Crowley TX PD; Cullman County AL SO; Cumberland Metro IN PD; Davison Township MI PD; Dearborn MI PD; Decatur IN PD; El Cajon CA PD; Fishers IN PD; Fort Wayne IN PD; Franklin IN PD; Gas City IN PD; Glendale OH PD; Grand Blanc Twp MI PD; Grant County IN SO; Greene County IN SO; Greene County MO SO; Hamburg Township MI PD (Livingston County); Harrison County IN SO; Harvey County KS SO; Hazel Park MI PD; Hillsborough County FL SO; IN - Tipton County SO; Independence KS PD; Indiana HIDTA; Indiana State Police; Jonesboro AR PD; Lee County GA SO; Macon County NC SO; Marion Health PD (IN); Marion IN PD; Markle IN PD; Marshall TX PD; Mauldin SC PD; Milford MI PD; Nassau County NY PD; New Haven IN PD; Newton County MS SO; Oxford MS PD; Oxford PD - OH; Palm Springs CA PD; Pittsboro IN PD; Pittsburg KS PD; Purcell OK PD; Putnam County GA SO; Puyallup WA PD; Republic MO PD; Seymour IN PD; St. Francois County MO SO; Sterling Heights MI PD; Sun Valley PD ID; Tampa FL PD; Taylor MI PD; Tulsa County OK SO; Utah County UT SO - Vineyard PD; Village of Clearview WV PD; Whitestown IN PD; Wichita Falls TX PD; Woodlawn OH PD. No agencies were added. Camera count (13), data retention (30 days), and hotlist sources were unchanged. Change occurred between portal snapshots of 2026-06-27 and 2026-07-01.
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
Anoka County Sheriff's Office started sharing with Sugar Creek MO PD
Started sharing with a new agencyAnoka County Sheriff's Office added the Sugar Creek Police Department (MO) to its "Sharing Network Data With" list (organizations granted access to Anoka County SO data).
What does this mean?
The agency added another law enforcement agency to its sharing network, letting that agency search its plate data. Minn. Stat. 13.824 allows sharing for legitimate law enforcement purposes and requires any agency that receives the data to follow the same retention and security rules, but each new partner widens who can see where local drivers have been. -
St. Louis Park PD cut data retention from 60 to 30 days
Data-retention period changedThe portal's data retention period changed from 60 days to 30 days.
What does this mean?
The number of days the agency keeps plate reads changed. Minn. Stat. 13.824 requires ALPR data not linked to an active criminal investigation to be destroyed within 60 days, so a general retention period above 60 days conflicts with state law. A longer window leaves a deeper searchable history of drivers' movements, and a shorter one limits how far back a query can reach. -
Stillwater PD stopped sharing with Fort Collins Police Services
Stopped sharing with an agencyStillwater PD removed Fort Collins Police Services (FCPS) (CO) from its "Sharing Network Data With" list (organizations granted access to Stillwater PD data).
What does this mean?
The agency removed a sharing partner, narrowing who can search its plate data. This can follow a policy change, public pressure, or a contract decision. -
University of Minnesota PD went from 11 to 12 cameras
Camera(s) addedThe portal's camera count increased from 11 to 12.
What does this mean?
The number of ALPR cameras the agency operates went up. Each camera photographs every passing vehicle and records its plate, make, model, and color, whether or not the vehicle is on a hotlist. Adding cameras puts more local roads under automated tracking, and Minnesota requires agencies to report stationary camera locations to the state BCA. -
University of Minnesota PD went from 10 to 11 cameras
Camera(s) addedThe portal's camera count increased from 10 to 11.
What does this mean?
The number of ALPR cameras the agency operates went up. Each camera photographs every passing vehicle and records its plate, make, model, and color, whether or not the vehicle is on a hotlist. Adding cameras puts more local roads under automated tracking, and Minnesota requires agencies to report stationary camera locations to the state BCA. -
South St. Paul PD started sharing with five more agencies
Started sharing with a new agencyBegan sharing with five additional agencies: Belle Plaine PD (MN), Dayton PD (MN), New Richmond PD (WI), Sherburne County Sheriff's Office (MN), and South Lake Minnetonka PD (MN).
What does this mean?
The agency added another law enforcement agency to its sharing network, letting that agency search its plate data. Minn. Stat. 13.824 allows sharing for legitimate law enforcement purposes and requires any agency that receives the data to follow the same retention and security rules, but each new partner widens who can see where local drivers have been.